<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Nanocomposite Microscopy on Nanoclay Guide</title><link>https://nanoclayguide.com/tags/nanocomposite-microscopy/</link><description>Recent content in Nanocomposite Microscopy on Nanoclay Guide</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://nanoclayguide.com/tags/nanocomposite-microscopy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>TEM and SEM Imaging of Nanoclays: What Good Dispersion Actually Looks Like</title><link>https://nanoclayguide.com/blog/tem-sem-imaging-nanoclays-dispersion/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://nanoclayguide.com/blog/tem-sem-imaging-nanoclays-dispersion/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;X-ray diffraction tells you the average layer spacing in a nanoclay sample, but it can&amp;rsquo;t show you a single platelet. Electron microscopy can. When you want to &lt;em&gt;see&lt;/em&gt; whether your clay is &lt;a href="https://nanoclayguide.com/blog/nanoclay-polymer-nanocomposites-beginners-guide/"&gt;exfoliated into individual layers&lt;/a&gt;, intercalated into expanded stacks, or just sitting around as undispersed clumps, you reach for a microscope — and the two main types, TEM and SEM, answer different questions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article explains what each technique shows, what good dispersion looks like under each, and why microscopy and diffraction are best used together.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>